Feedback

Feedback
>
Draft 1
>
Trust

Question 1 - option C:

What are your views on how Xoserve funds our next Efficiency Review?

Retrospectively apply the Cost/Benefit Analysis methodology to S&O cost increases for scope items that came into effect during BP23, BP24 and BP25

BP26 includes a matrix that shows how we believe Value for Money can be articulated across the items of scope that have been added since the last Review. Additionally, the proposed changes to S&O described in BP26, and each Investment Proposal, have been assessed using our standardised Cost/Benefit Analysis methodology.

Respond to other questions

0 Comments

Respond to other questions

Click the questions below to view the responses and share your feedback.

Trust

Question 1: Do you support the sharing of BP26 content relating to the BPIR categories ‘Current Performance’ and ‘Outputs’ digitally rather than statically in the BP26 PDF documentation?
Question 2: Do you think there are any other BPIR categories that we should explore in following this approach?
Question 3: Is there anything that didn’t feature in BP25 that you would like to see included in BP26?

Innovate

Question 1: Do you support investment in BP26 to fund an independent VfM Review ahead of BP27?
Question 2: Are there any proposed investment areas that you feel are / are not priorities for BP26?
Question 3: Are there any other areas that you feel we should be focusing on?

Deliver

Question 1: Are there any other ways you would like us to engage with you during the development of BP26 that have not been set out in this document? If so, please specify.